What happens in Marrickville today would have been of interest to the enforcers of the War Precautions Act 1914 had it happened a century ago. Sunday, 22 November 2015, saw the Gallipoli Centenary Peace Campaign (GCPC) and St Brigid’s Parish host a public forum in Marrickville on the internment in 1918 and deportation in 1920 of Passionist priest, Father Charles Jerger.
Charles Jerger (GCPC)
The three speakers were Dr Janice Garaty, Associate Professor Douglas Newton and Dr Peter Manning. (Douglas Newton is one of Honest History’s distinguished supporters.) GCPC has provided summaries of the presentations, along with links to further readings. There is also the full text of Douglas Newton’s address; the full texts of Janice Garaty’s and Peter Manning’s talks should be on the GCPC site soon.
In her presentation, Janice Garaty pointed out that Father Jerger had been resident in Australia for 28 years (since the age of two) but was interned following complaints that one of his sermons discouraged recruitment. The furore over his remarks revealed splits within the Catholic community but also divisions between Catholics and Protestants. His internment and deportation occurred despite public protests.
Douglas Newton saw parallels between fear-mongering then and now and the use of the far-reaching but deliberately vague regime under the War Precautions Act then to silence dissent on the pretext of preventing statements ‘likely to prejudice the recruiting, training, discipline, or administration of any of His Majesty’s forces…’
Sadly, like so much emergency legislation, that of Australia during the Great War [Newton concluded] was open to abuse and became an instrument for political vindictiveness and the politics of exclusion – deployed then, and still, by little men seeking to milk political advantage from great world tragedies.
Peter Manning compared the War Precautions Act with recent ‘counter-terrorism’ legislation, the Australian Citizenship Amendment (Allegiance to Australia) Bill 2015. The bill as first drafted cast a wide net, well beyond ‘terrorists’, and was amended following a committee report. Even with the amendments the Bill is flawed, Manning says, but it passed both houses of the Parliament with the support of Labor.
In reflecting on the draft legislation and the creation of two classes of citizenship, Manning argued that what happened to Fr Jerger in 1920 could happen again today with the passing of the Australian Citizenship Amendment (Allegiance to Australia) Bill 2015. For Manning, the lamentable lesson of Australia’s most recent bout in enacting “counter-terrorism” laws is this: “that, with a quarter of Australia with double-passports and a third of Australia speaking a language other than English at home, we are ripe to see many more Fr Jergers filling our jails and being deported back “to where they came from”, whether they like it or not, and whether they die or not”.
It is worth comparing the treatment of awkward customers a century ago and the treatment of similar individuals now. The difference is, of course, that the country was at war a century ago and we are not at war now. (Or are we?)
Indonesian internees, Cowra NSW, September 1943 (AWM 030150/11)
18 December 2015
Update 23 December 2015: Spencer Zifcak in Pearls and Irritations on how the new counter-terrorism laws marginalise the judiciary.