Diamadis, Panayiotis: Friendships are based on truths: looking again at the crime of crimes (Hellenic genocides 1914-22)

Panayiotis Diamadis

‘Friendships are based on truths: looking again at the crime of crimes’, Honest History, 30 August 2016

In recent weeks, there have been three major pieces published in The Australian and the Daily Telegraph (Sydney) on the genocides of the indigenous Hellenes, Armenians and Assyrians of the Ottoman Turkish Empire. Two of these articles advocate for media and political recognition of the genocides,[1] while the third insists that to do this would ‘threaten friendship’.[2] All three pieces generated much comment, both online and in other forms, with a good deal of the discussion revolving around the maxim that sincere friendships are based on truths.

1952 largeGreek memorial to Australian servicemen, World War II, unveiled Athens, Anzac Day, 1952 (Imperial War Museum, UK A321117)

An enduring myth of Australian-Turkish relations is that the two peoples ‘have had a special bond since the Gallipoli campaign’.[3] There are a number of points which shatter this claim. First, the Enemy Aliens Act 1920 prohibited Turks entering Australia for five years and ‘Asiatic Turks’ continued to be prohibited from entry to Australia under the White Australia Policy. Only ‘European Turks’ (Muslims born on Cyprus) were able to migrate. Not until the dismantling of the White Australia Policy in 1967 was migration permitted.[4] No such restrictions applied to Hellenes, Assyrians or Armenians.

Then, there was no official Turkish diplomatic mission in Australia until 1967. On the other hand, the Hellenic Republic has had a Consulate in Sydney since 1926 and an Embassy in Canberra since 1953 while Australia has had an embassy in Athens since 1955. There is no doubt that Ankara and Canberra have developed a close relationship over the last few decades. However, to claim that the Anzac centenary (1915-2015) marks ‘100 years of friendship’[5] goes beyond the realm of poetic licence. On its logo, the Australian Turkish Advocacy Alliance (a group created and funded by the Turkish Embassy in Canberra) claims 2015 marks ‘the centenary of Turkish-Australian friendship’, ignoring the fact that a state of war continued between Australia and the Ottoman Turkish Empire until the latter surrendered in October 1918, and even beyond that to the Chanak Crisis of 1922.

Special bonds between peoples often arise from shared wartime experiences. In 1946, at the initiative of the Australian Hellenic community, the Australian government was presented with a 2500-year-old Corinthian urn filled with earth from Anzac graves at Athens.[6] In 1993, the remains of the Unknown Australian Soldier were exhumed from the Western Front for reinterment at the heart of the Australian War Memorial in Canberra.[7] The same institution is home to the sculpted lions that once adorned the Menin Gate in Belgium, which were presented to the Australian people in gratitude for their service between 1914 and 1918.[8] ‘Special bonds’ between peoples based on honesty and truth do not require embellishment in flowery words.

All religious beliefs have truth as the basis of their faiths. Whether it is Christianity or Islam, Buddhism or Shinto, truth forms the core of the theology. Philosophers and artists obsess about truth. Human relationships – friendships – whether involving individuals or nations, are similarly based on honesty, on speaking truthfully.

Writing in The Australian on 6 August, Foreign Editor Greg Sheridan said, ‘The killings 100 years ago of Armenians, Greeks and Assyrians in what is now Turkey were indeed a complex matter and are much debated historically. But there is no denying that these killings … resulted in the effective elimination of the Christian population.’[9]

Istanbul_Armenian_Genocide_memorialIstanbul Armenian genocide memorial, erected 1919, dismantled and lost 1922 (Wikimedia Commons

Genocide scholars agree that, prior to the outbreak of World War I, the government of the Ottoman Turkish Empire organised and implemented a plan to destroy the indigenous Christian populations of the territory it controlled. The coordinated effort to ‘clear’ these ‘weeds’, to quote the then-ruling Young Turk party, began from the Gallipoli Peninsula (part of the European region of eastern Thrace) and the Aegean coast of Anatolia (known historically as Asia Minor). The geographic regions of eastern Thrace, Anatolia and Mesopotamia (modern Turkey, north-east Syria and Iraq) are the ancestral homelands of the Empire’s indigenous peoples, the Hellenes, Armenians and Assyrians. These lands also formed the core of the Ottoman Turkish Empire, envisaged by Young Turk ideologues as a religiously homogenous Turkish state.

Australia’s first resident Orthodox priest, Father Serapheim Phokas (also spelled Focas) was born on the Gallipoli Peninsula. He served his multilingual parish of the Holy Trinity in inner Sydney’s Surry Hills from 1898 until his retirement in 1915. The first Australian Hellene medical doctor, Dr Constantine Kyriazopoulos, was born and educated in Adrianople (modern Edirne), the second largest city of eastern Thrace. Australia’s pioneer café owners – the Tavlarides brothers – were born a short distance north of Gallipoli, in a fishing town then known as Peristasi, modern Sarysh. The elder brother, Adam, migrated in 1905, followed by Ioacheim[10] two years later. Their widowed mother and sisters came in 1911, forced to abandon the strategic Gallipoli region by the pressure of the Ottoman Turkish state.

Destitute Assyrian and Armenian survivors fleeing the Ottoman Turkish Army in the Urmiah region of Persia (Iran) were rescued by members of the Dunsterforce in the northern summer of 1918. Thanks to the selfless actions of Captains Hooper, Judge, Savige and others, 40 000 men, women and children reached the relative safety of British-held territory. Armenian children orphaned by the genocidal actions of the Turkish state (in both its Ottoman and Republican forms) were given new lives in places such as Antelias (in northern Beirut, Lebanon) thanks to the generosity of Australians on the ground and at home.

Deep ties bind the indigenous Hellenes, Armenians and Assyrians and the ‘Great Southern Land’, going back to the trade links and the first migrants of the 1800s. A similar ‘special bond’ between Australians and Turks began being cultivated in the 1980s and 1990s, particularly with the passing of the last Anzacs to serve on the Gallipoli Peninsula. That former enemies are able to commemorate their war dead side-by-side is a sign of maturity. Relationships which are mature are able to accept truths being told, no matter how painful.

640px-Near_East_relief_armenian_woman_with_baby_in_syria3Armenian refugees, Syria, 1915 (Wikimedia Commons)

It is no more ‘openly divisive’ or ‘creating animosity’ for friends to speak these and other truths in 2016 than it was for the Australian media to inform its readers early in World War I that a systematic exterminatory policy had been implemented by the Turkish state against its indigenous Christian populations.[11] It is not ‘openly divisive’ or ‘creating animosity’ to discuss the criminal prosecution of those involved in the genocides of the indigenous Hellenic, Armenian and Assyrian peoples by the post-Great War Turkish government.

Since time immemorial, honesty has been known as the best policy. The oft-cited words attributed to Mustafa Kemal are being demonstrated by the research of Honest History and others to have no demonstrable link to him.[12] No credible historic record – document or sound recording – has been found that Mustafa Kemal ever uttered those words. Greg Sheridan and John Adams have now joined the growing ranks of Australian commentators accused of being ‘openly divisive’ and ‘creating animosity’ by writing the truth.


[1] Greg Sheridan ‘Western media shuts its eyes to persecution of Christians by IS’, The Australian, 6 August 2016, https://www.theaustralian.com.au/opinion/columnists/greg-sheridan/western-media-shuts-its-eyes-to-persecution-of-christians-by-is/news-story/3732458383e02dad0c961d56e76fda4d ;  John Adams, ‘Time to take Turkey to task over genocides’, Daily Telegraph, 5 August 2016 https://catallaxyfiles.com/2016/08/05/guest-post-john-adams-time-to-take-turkey-to-task-over-genocide/ .

[2] Baris Atayman ‘Don’t threaten friendship’, Daily Telegraph, 12 August 2016, https://www.ata-a.org.au/dont-threaten-friendship/ .

[3] Ibid.

[4] ‘History of immigration from Turkey’, https://museumvictoria.com.au/origins/history.aspx?pid=64 .

[5] Australian Turkish Advocacy Alliance, https://www.facebook.com/ATAAlliance .

[6] ‘Grecian urn’, https://www.awm.gov.au/collection/ART30402/ .

[7] ‘The Unknown Soldier’, https://www.awm.gov.au/commemoration/customs/soldier/ .

[8] ‘Menin Gate Lions’, https://www.awm.gov.au/encyclopedia/menin/lions/ .

[9] Sheridan, op. cit.

[10] He later adopted the name Mick Adams.

[11] ‘Persecuted Greeks: wives and children killed’, Sydney Morning Herald, 19 May 1914, p. 9 https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/15509132?browse=ndp%3Abrowse%2Fdate%2F1914%2F05%2F19%2Ftitle%2F35%2Fpage%2F1279919%2Farticle%2F15509132 ; ‘Piteous condition of Greeks’, Argus (Melbourne), 28 June 1915, p. 7, https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/1527291 .

[12] ‘Talking Turkey, https://honesthistory.net.au/wp/talking-turkey/ .

Click here for all items related to: ,
To comment or discuss, Log in to Honest History.
5 comments on “Diamadis, Panayiotis: Friendships are based on truths: looking again at the crime of crimes (Hellenic genocides 1914-22)
  1. Atongway1969 says:

    The ottomans forced the neighbors Kurds to commit genocides as a lateral movement

  2. Australian Turkish Advocacy Alliance says:

    Thank you Honest History for providing the platform for yet another provocative debate on history.
    Greeks, Armenians, Jews and Turks are the same people who lived side by side for hundreds of years in peace. Culturally we are the same people in many aspects. With the rise of nationalism following the French Revolution and the Treaty of Westphalia, this peaceful co-existence came to an end. Beginning in the Balkans, neighbours turned against each other from the early 1800s onward.

    “The orgy of genocide exhausted itself in the Peloponnese only when there were no more Turks to kill.”1

    “The massacres in Vrachori commenced with the Jews and soon Musulmans shared the same fate. “2

    The excerpts above are among the many depictions of barbarism against Muslims and Jews in today’s Greece by nationalists. Allied forces occupying today’s Turkey have also published more than a few reports summing up the atrocities carried out by Greek regular and irregular armies.3

    Trying to depict Greeks as the victims of a genocide is absurd. Panayiotis either does not know what constitutes a genocide or has a different agenda in vulgarising this term. Vulgarising the term genocide harms our chances to prevent the future ones. The UN’s 1948 Genocide Convention precisely defines the legal term genocide. Whatever happened in the Ottoman Empire in 1915 does not constitute to genocide.
    According to the Israeli scholar Tal Buenos:4 “If something is not a fact, then it is not denied, it’s refuted or rejected. People might call you a denier to make it seem as if they have ownership of facts. It is a tactic.”

    According to UN’s 1948 Genocide Convention, in order for an event to be considered genocide, there should be a court ruling. This is the obligatory condition. Politicians and historians whose perspectives are shrouded with ethnic or religious bias should not vulgarise the term to ensure we can continue to keep perpetrators accountable for their crimes.

    By 1921, Armenian allegations had already been found unsubstantiated by the equivalent of a competent court mentioned in the UN Genocide Convention of 1948. In Malta Tribunals set by the British, the special prosecutor found no evidence to convict Ottoman prisoners of any wrongdoing against Armenians or other minorities, despite having unprecedented access to the Ottoman archives. Yet the historic debate continues.

    Please use your time to find the truth by yourself before buying into the biased history lessons by Sheridan, Joe Adams and other part-time historians. Read all sides of the history and make up your own mind. We, as an organisation, won’t enter into argument to prove who is a better/older friend of Australia. Maybe what we understand from friendship is different than what Panayiotis understands of it. Still, the interested reader can research about the strong bond Stanley M Bruce and Charles Ryan had with Turks and Turkey.

    1 St. Clair, William (1972). That Greece Might Still Be Free – The Philhellenes in the War of (Via Wikipedia)
    2 Finlay, George (1971) [1861]. H. F. Tozer, ed. History of the Greek Revolution and the Reign of King Otho. London.(Via Wikipedia)
    3 https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/soc.culture.greek/KHlutjFNwyk
    4 https://www.ata-a.org.au/tal_buenos_speech/

    Baris Atayman

  3. panosleberdicaeopolis says:

    panayoitis this post is extremely beneficial to my studies. Thankyou for your post very informative!

  4. stephanhabib says:

    fabulous article Panos!

Leave a Reply