Two invasions in Australian history: can we now stop using euphemisms about 25 April 1915?

Both Prime Minister Turnbull and Opposition Leader Shorten have used the word ‘invasion’ to describe what happened in Australia in 1788. (They still differ over reconciling, recognising, and whether or not to have a treaty.)

Now that we have bipartisan agreement on 26 January 1788 is it possible we can also call what happened in the Dardanelles on 25 April 1915 an ‘invasion’ rather than use the euphemistic word ‘landing’? To use the test the prime minister applied – what the local inhabitants thought of what was happening – there is no doubt the Ottoman Turks thought they were being invaded.

15 June 2016

Share this with others...Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterEmail this to someone
Click here for all items related to: ,
To comment or discuss, Register and Log in to Honest History.
One comment on “Two invasions in Australian history: can we now stop using euphemisms about 25 April 1915?
  1. MichaelD says:

    There is a difference in my opinion, that Turkey was at war with the British Empire in 1915, Indigenous Australians were not at war with the British Empire in 1788. For my mind, the term ‘invasion’ brings an unlawful or unexpected quality to an event.

Leave a Reply

Loading...